Jeep Compass Safety Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown for англоязычный Buyers

The Jeep Compass, a popular compact SUV, has undergone rigorous testing to ensure occupant safety. For prospective buyers in the англоязычный market, understanding these safety ratings is crucial in making an informed decision. This comprehensive guide breaks down the safety performance of the 2022-2025 Jeep Compass models, drawing from evaluations conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). We delve into various crash tests and safety feature assessments to provide a clear picture of the Jeep Compass’s safety capabilities.

Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Driver-Side Evaluation

The small overlap front crash test simulates a collision where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end, on the driver side, impacts an object. This test is particularly challenging for vehicle structures. The IIHS evaluation of the 2022-2025 Jeep Compass models reveals key insights into its driver-side protection.

The Jeep Compass achieved a Good overall rating in the driver-side small overlap front test. Specifically, the structure and safety cage of the vehicle were rated Acceptable. Crucially, all driver injury measures – head/neck, chest, hip/thigh, and lower leg/foot – received Good ratings. This indicates a strong level of protection for the driver in this type of severe frontal crash. Furthermore, driver restraints and dummy kinematics were also rated Good, signifying effective occupant control during the impact.

Technical measurements from the test provide a deeper dive into the vehicle’s performance. Occupant compartment intrusion measurements on the driver side show a maximum lower hinge pillar intrusion of 6 cm and footrest intrusion of 6 cm. Upper occupant compartment intrusions were also measured, with the upper hinge pillar showing 8 cm and the upper dash reaching 10 cm of intrusion. These measurements are essential for engineers in understanding structural deformation during the crash.

Driver injury measurements provide data on the forces experienced by the crash test dummy. The head injury criterion (HIC-15) was recorded at 137, with no hard contact observed. Neck tension was 1.4 kN, and chest maximum compression was 20 mm, all within safe limits. Femur forces and tibia index values were also low, indicating minimal risk of leg injuries.

Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Passenger-Side Evaluation

Extending the small overlap assessment to the passenger side, the IIHS also evaluated the Jeep Compass for passenger-side small overlap frontal crashes. This test mirrors the driver-side test but assesses the protection offered to the front passenger.

Similar to the driver-side, the Jeep Compass earned an Overall evaluation of Good in the passenger-side small overlap test. The structure and safety cage maintained an Acceptable rating. Passenger injury measures for head/neck, chest, hip/thigh, and lower leg/foot were all rated Good, mirroring the driver-side performance. Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics also achieved a Good rating, indicating effective passenger protection systems. Interestingly, driver injury measures are also reported in this passenger-side test and all received Good ratings, although the focus is on the passenger.

Technical measurements for the passenger side test show slightly different intrusion levels compared to the driver’s side. Lower occupant compartment intrusion measurements include a maximum lower hinge pillar intrusion of 8 cm and footrest intrusion of 8 cm. Upper occupant compartment intrusions show 11 cm at the upper hinge pillar and 8 cm at the upper dash.

Passenger injury measurements recorded a HIC-15 of 208, again with no hard contact. Neck tension was 1.4 kN and chest maximum compression was 19 mm. Femur forces and tibia index values remained low, indicating good passenger leg protection. Driver injury measurements in this passenger-side test also showed favorable results, reinforcing the robust safety design of the Jeep Compass.

Moderate Overlap Front Crash Test: Original Evaluation

The moderate overlap front crash test represents a more common type of frontal collision, where a significant portion of the vehicle’s front end impacts a barrier. The original IIHS moderate overlap test provides another critical perspective on the Jeep Compass’s frontal crashworthiness.

In the moderate overlap front test, the Jeep Compass achieved an Overall evaluation of Good. The structure and safety cage were also rated Good, highlighting the vehicle’s ability to maintain its structural integrity in a moderate frontal impact. Driver injury measures for head/neck, chest, and leg/foot (both left and right) all received Good ratings. Driver restraints and dummy kinematics were again rated Good, demonstrating consistent effective protection systems.

Technical measurements for this test reveal footwell intrusion measurements, including 2 cm at the footrest and 7 cm at the right footwell. Instrument panel rearward movement was minimal, with 1 cm on the left and 0 cm on the right. Steering column movement was also controlled, with -2 cm upward and -4 cm rearward. A-pillar rearward movement was 0 cm, indicating minimal structural deformation in the critical occupant space.

Driver injury measurements showed a HIC-15 of 313, with no hard contact. Neck tension was 1.3 kN and chest maximum compression was 27 mm. Femur forces and tibia index values were again low, reinforcing the good protection offered in moderate frontal crashes.

Side Impact Crash Test: Original Evaluation

Side impacts are another significant source of injuries in vehicle accidents. The IIHS side crash test evaluates how well a vehicle protects occupants in a side collision. The 2022 Jeep Compass Limited 4-door 4wd was tested for side impact protection.

The Jeep Compass demonstrated strong side impact performance, achieving an Overall evaluation of Good. Both the structure and safety cage earned a Good rating. Driver injury measures for head/neck, torso, and pelvis/leg were all rated Good. Crucially, driver head protection was also rated Good, indicating effective side airbag deployment and head protection systems. Rear passenger injury measures for head/neck, torso, and pelvis/leg also received Good ratings, and rear passenger head protection was also rated Good, showing comprehensive side impact protection for both front and rear occupants.

Technical measurements in the side impact test show a B-pillar intrusion of -21.0 cm relative to the driver’s seat centerline, indicating that the structural crush stopped short of the occupant space.

Driver injury measurements recorded a HIC-15 of 442. Neck tension was 0.9 kN and compression was 0.2 kN. Torso maximum deflection was 37 mm. Pelvis combined force was 2.9 kN. Passenger injury measures also showed favorable results, with a HIC-15 of 122, neck compression of 1.3 kN, and torso maximum deflection of 33 mm. These metrics confirm the Jeep Compass’s robust side impact protection.

Roof Strength Test

Roof strength is a critical factor in rollover accidents. The roof strength test assesses a vehicle’s ability to withstand forces in a rollover scenario. The 2017 Jeep Compass Latitude 4-door 4wd was evaluated for roof strength.

The Jeep Compass achieved an Overall evaluation of Good in roof strength. With a curb weight of 3,429 lbs and a peak force of 16,952 lbs, the Jeep Compass demonstrated a strength-to-weight ratio of 4.94. This strong ratio signifies good roof strength and rollover protection.

Head Restraints & Seats Evaluation

Head restraints and seats play a vital role in preventing whiplash and other injuries in rear-end collisions. The IIHS evaluates these features for their dynamic performance and geometry.

The Jeep Compass with manual leatherette seats received an Overall evaluation of Good for head restraints & seats. Both the dynamic rating and seat/head restraint geometry were rated Good. Technical measurements showed a backset of 6 mm and a distance below the top of the head of 6 mm, indicating good head restraint positioning. The seat design parameters also passed the test criteria.

Headlights Ratings Across Trim Levels

Headlight performance is crucial for nighttime driving safety. The IIHS evaluates headlights based on illumination distance and glare. The Jeep Compass offers different headlight variations across its trim levels, and their ratings vary.

For the Latitude Lux, Limited, and Trailhawk trims equipped with specific Premium Lighting Group, Elite Group, or High Altitude packages, the Jeep Compass headlights received an Overall rating of Good. These trims feature LED projector low-beam and high-beam headlights, and are equipped with high-beam assist. Low beam visibility was rated good on straightaways and right curves, fair on a sharp left curve, and inadequate on a gradual left curve. High beams provided good visibility in all tests.

For the Latitude, Latitude Lux, Limited, and Trailhawk trims with standard LED reflector headlights, the Overall rating is Acceptable. These also feature high-beam assist. Low beam visibility was fair on straightaways and right curves, and inadequate on left curves. High beam visibility was good on the right straightaway but inadequate on the left straightaway and left curves.

The Sport trim, with LED reflector headlights but without high-beam assist, received a Marginal Overall rating. Low beam and high beam performance is similar to the other LED reflector headlight version, but the lack of high-beam assist impacts the overall score.

Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Assessment

Front crash prevention systems are designed to mitigate or prevent collisions with other vehicles. The IIHS evaluates these systems for their effectiveness in vehicle-to-vehicle scenarios.

The 2022-2023 Jeep Compass models with standard Full Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus system initially received a Superior rating in the original vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention test. The system met forward collision warning requirements and avoided a collision in the 12 mph test. In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph.

However, the vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention testing was updated to version 2.0 for 2023-2025 models. Under the newer, more stringent 2.0 test, the Jeep Compass with the same Full Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus system achieved a Marginal Overall evaluation. While the system avoided collisions in tests against passenger car targets at speeds up to 43 mph, performance was less effective against motorcycle targets, with speed reductions ranging from 18 to 28 mph. Semitrailer tests were warning-only and not fully evaluated in the provided data.

Front Crash Prevention: Pedestrian (Day) Assessment

Pedestrian front crash prevention systems are increasingly important. The IIHS evaluates these systems for their ability to detect and react to pedestrians in daytime conditions.

The Jeep Compass with standard Full Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus achieved an Advanced Overall evaluation in pedestrian front crash prevention (day). The system demonstrated collision avoidance in crossing child and crossing adult scenarios at 12 mph. In 25 mph tests for crossing child and crossing adult, collisions were avoided or impact speed was significantly reduced. In the parallel adult scenario, the system avoided a collision at 25 mph and reduced impact speed in the 37 mph test.

Seat Belt Reminders Evaluation

Seat belt reminders are simple yet effective safety features. The IIHS evaluates their effectiveness in alerting occupants to unbelted status.

The Jeep Compass received a Marginal Overall evaluation for seat belt reminders. While the front row unbelted occupant alert met duration and volume requirements, and audio frequency was within acceptable parameters, the second row startup status alert is absent.

Child Seat Anchors (LATCH) Evaluation

Child seat anchors (LATCH) make installing child seats easier and more secure. The IIHS evaluates the ease of use of LATCH systems.

The Jeep Compass received a Marginal Overall evaluation for child seat anchors. The vehicle has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and one additional position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors. However, lower anchors were rated as too deep in the seat and difficult to maneuver around in positions 1 and 3.

Conclusion: Jeep Compass Ratings and Safety Performance

Overall, the Jeep Compass demonstrates a solid safety profile based on IIHS ratings. It achieves Good ratings in most crash tests, including small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side impact, and roof strength. Headlights ratings vary by trim, with top trims achieving Good and lower trims ranging from Acceptable to Marginal. Front crash prevention systems show Advanced pedestrian detection but a Marginal rating in the updated vehicle-to-vehicle test. Seat belt reminders and child seat anchors are areas for potential improvement, both rated Marginal.

For англоязычный car buyers prioritizing safety, the Jeep Compass offers robust crash protection and advanced safety features. Understanding these detailed ratings allows for a well-informed purchase decision, balancing safety performance with other vehicle attributes.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *