The Fisker Karma, an extended-range electric car, initially captivated onlookers with its stunning design and futuristic, almost sci-fi humming sound during its test program. However, beyond the initial allure, our extensive evaluation uncovered significant frustrations. Ultimately, the Fisker Karma earned a failing grade, positioning it as the lowest-rated luxury sedan in our assessments. In fact, among all sedans we’ve tested, only a few models with considerably lower price tags—the Chrysler 200, Dodge Avenger, and Nissan Versa SV—scored worse overall.
As is often the case with vehicles receiving a “not recommended” rating from Consumer Reports, the Karma’s poor score isn’t attributable to a single defect, but rather a multitude of shortcomings. While much attention has been given to the well-documented issues with our test model—including a breakdown on our track leading to a battery replacement, persistent glitches affecting the instruments, windows, and radio, and frequently illuminated warning lights—these specific incidents, though frustrating, aren’t the primary drivers of the low score. Our test Karma’s numerous visits to the dealership, despite the excellent service provided, highlight deeper, inherent flaws in the car’s design and execution.
The fundamental issues plaguing the Fisker Karma extend beyond mere malfunctions. The vehicle suffers from several critical compromises, including poorly designed and unintuitive dashboard controls, severely limited visibility, a cramped and uncomfortable interior, and challenging ingress and egress. Furthermore, the engine noise is intrusive when operating, battery recharge times are excessively long, and both the backseat and trunk offer minimal space, diminishing its practicality as a luxury sedan. The Karma’s considerable weight, comparable to that of an SUV, negatively impacts its agility and overall performance, resulting in a driving experience that lacks the expected responsiveness and power for a vehicle in its class.
Considering its retail price exceeding $100,000, expectations for the Fisker Karma were understandably high. However, this vehicle falls considerably short of justifying its premium price tag. In a comparative analysis featured in our November issue, we pitted the Karma against the Porsche Panamera, another high-end vehicle in the same price bracket that Fisker identified as a primary competitor. While the Panamera may not offer the same level of fuel economy as the Karma, it surpasses it in virtually every other aspect, outperforming the Karma by a significant 27 points in our evaluations.
Undeniably, the Fisker Karma possesses an undeniable visual appeal and commands attention wherever it goes. Fisker, as a fledgling startup, deserves recognition for successfully bringing the Karma to market—a feat that has eluded many aspiring automotive companies. This accomplishment underscores the formidable challenges inherent in the automotive industry, dominated by established global giants, and highlights the inherent risks faced by early adopters venturing into cutting-edge automotive technology.
For a more in-depth look at our assessment, we encourage you to watch our video review and explore the comprehensive ratings and review available on our Fisker Karma model page for complete details.
Further Reading on Fisker Karma Issues:
- Fire leads Fisker to recall Karma, again
- Fisker Karma electric car recalled due to possible coolant leak and fire
- Fisker shows smaller Atlantic plug-in hybrid sedan in NY
- Fisker Q&A reveals other owners face Karma challenges, solutions are promised
- Fisker to replace Karma’s drive battery
- Five questions with Henrik Fisker, father of the $100,000 Karma plug-in hybrid
