When the Mazda CX-50 was first introduced, many anticipated it as a direct replacement for the popular CX-5. Industry observers speculated that Mazda might follow its previous strategies, either phasing out the CX-5 entirely or offering both models side-by-side for a limited period. Similar to how the CX-9 transitioned to the CX-90, or how the CX-3 remained as a budget option alongside the newer CX-30, the future of the CX-5 seemed uncertain. However, Mazda has opted for a different approach, keeping the CX-5 in production across a wide range of trim levels. This positions the CX-5 as the more budget-conscious choice, while the CX-50 emerges as its modern counterpart, bringing a fresh perspective to the compact SUV segment. For car buyers in the market for a compact SUV, understanding the nuances between the CX-5 vs CX-50 is crucial to making the right decision.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: A Matter of Size and Space
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete within the competitive compact SUV category. However, within this class, vehicles can vary significantly in size. The CX-5 leans towards the more compact end of the spectrum. Measuring 180 inches in length, it’s noticeably shorter than rivals like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan, each exceeding it by approximately half a foot. While this difference might seem minor on paper, it translates to less passenger room, particularly in the rear seats. Taller adults may find the CX-5’s back row somewhat cramped, contrasting with the more spacious feel offered by the Honda and Volkswagen.
Recognizing the demand for increased space, Mazda designed the CX-50 with larger dimensions. Extending 6 inches longer than the CX-5, the CX-50 prioritizes both passenger comfort and cargo capacity. While the CR-V and Tiguan still maintain a lead in overall roominess, the CX-50 aims to provide a more comfortable and practical interior environment compared to the CX-5. This difference in size is a key factor when considering Cx-50 Vs Cx-5 for families or those needing extra space.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: Performance and Engine Options
In terms of powertrain options, Mazda has largely mirrored the CX-5’s offerings for the CX-50. Both models share the same standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, delivering 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For drivers seeking enhanced performance, a turbocharged version of this engine is available for both the CX-5 and CX-50. This turbocharged variant produces an impressive 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque when using regular gasoline, and even greater output – 256 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque – when fueled with 93 octane premium gasoline. Equipped with the turbocharged engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 rank among the quicker non-luxury compact SUVs available in the market, offering a spirited driving experience.
However, the CX-50 distinguishes itself with a future powertrain innovation. Beginning with the 2025 model year, the CX-50 will introduce a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain option. This hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid is projected to achieve a significantly improved fuel economy rating of 38 mpg in combined driving conditions, according to EPA estimates. This marks a substantial increase in efficiency compared to both the standard engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbocharged engine (25 mpg combined) available in both models. Importantly, this fuel-efficient hybrid option is currently exclusive to the CX-50 and is not offered for the CX-5, further differentiating the cx-50 vs cx-5 in terms of powertrain choices and fuel economy.
Conclusion: Choosing Between the CX-5 and CX-50
Ultimately, the choice between the CX-5 vs CX-50 depends on individual priorities and needs. The Mazda CX-5 remains a compelling option for buyers seeking a well-rounded, budget-friendly compact SUV. It offers Mazda’s signature driving dynamics and stylish design in a slightly smaller package. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-50 steps up as the more modern and spacious alternative, providing enhanced passenger and cargo room. Furthermore, the upcoming hybrid powertrain for the CX-50 adds a significant advantage in fuel efficiency, appealing to environmentally conscious buyers and those looking to reduce running costs. When weighing the cx-50 vs cx-5, consider your spatial requirements, performance preferences, and fuel economy needs to determine which Mazda compact SUV best fits your lifestyle.
