Navigating the world of vehicle safety ratings can be complex, especially when trying to compare different cars. Understanding how these ratings are calculated and what they truly represent is crucial for making informed decisions. One key metric to consider is the Overall Vehicle Score, often presented as a star rating. This score, designed to give consumers a quick snapshot of a vehicle’s safety performance, is derived from a comprehensive analysis of injury probabilities in various crash scenarios.
The Overall Vehicle Score is not simply an average of all test scores. Instead, it’s a calculated value based on the probabilities of injury determined in frontal and side crash tests, combined with a projected probability of injury from rollover resistance assessments. These probabilities are weighted to reflect the real-world frequency and severity of each type of crash. This weighted calculation provides a comprehensive injury risk assessment for a vehicle, which is then compared to the average risk across all vehicles.
Star ratings are assigned based on this comparison to the average fleet risk:
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐: Overall injury risk is much less than average.
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐: Overall injury risk is less than average to average.
- ⭐⭐⭐: Overall injury risk is average to greater than average.
- ⭐⭐: Overall injury risk is greater than average.
- ⭐: Overall injury risk is much greater than average.
However, a critical point to remember when using the Overall Vehicle Score for vehicle comparison, especially as Car And Driver Compare Vehicles, is the limitation on comparability. Because the Overall Vehicle Score incorporates the frontal crash test rating, comparisons are only valid between vehicles within the same class and with a weight difference of no more than 250 pounds. This weight and class restriction is vital for ensuring a fair and accurate safety comparison.
To illustrate this crucial point, consider these examples for when car and driver compare vehicles:
-
Incorrect Comparison: Comparing the safety scores of a 4,500-pound SUV to a 3,000-pound sedan is invalid. This is due to both the difference in vehicle class (SUV vs. sedan) and the significant weight disparity exceeding the 250-pound limit. These vehicles operate in fundamentally different ways in crashes due to their size and structural characteristics.
-
Incorrect Comparison: Comparing a 3,600-pound pickup truck to a 3,400-pound minivan is also inappropriate, even though the weight difference is within the acceptable range. The issue here is the different vehicle classes (pickup vs. van). Pickups and minivans have different structural designs and safety performance characteristics, making direct score comparisons misleading.
-
Correct Comparison: It is valid to compare the safety scores of a 3,400-pound passenger car with a 3,650-pound passenger car. This comparison is permissible because both vehicles belong to the same class (passenger car) and the weight difference (250 pounds) is within the allowed threshold. Such comparisons offer a more meaningful insight into relative safety performance within a similar vehicle category.
In conclusion, while the Overall Vehicle Score provides a valuable summary of vehicle safety, it’s essential to use it correctly when car and driver compare vehicles. Always ensure that you are comparing vehicles of the same class and within a similar weight range (plus or minus 250 pounds) for a meaningful and accurate assessment of their relative safety performance. Understanding these limitations will help you utilize safety ratings effectively and make well-informed choices when selecting your next vehicle.
