Audi A4’s Safety Ratings: Top Marks in Crash Tests

The Audi A4, a popular luxury sedan, has consistently demonstrated excellent safety performance in rigorous crash tests. This article delves into the safety ratings of the Audi A4, focusing on evaluations conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). These ratings apply to Audi A4 models from 2017 to 2025, encompassing the sedan, the A4 allroad wagon, and the A5 Sportback hatchback, all redesigned around the 2017 model year.

Small Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Driver-Side

The Audi A4 earned a “Good” rating in the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test, the highest possible rating. This test simulates a collision where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end on the driver’s side impacts a barrier.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Structure and safety cage G (Good)
Driver injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Chest G (Good)
Hip/thigh G (Good)
Lower leg/foot G (Good)
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics G (Good)

Action shot from the Audi A4 driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The crash test results revealed that the Audi A4’s structure and safety cage held up exceptionally well, maintaining the driver’s survival space. Measures of occupant compartment intrusion were minimal, indicating robust structural integrity.

Post-crash dummy position in the Audi A4 driver-side small overlap test, showing excellent survival space maintenance.

The frontal and side curtain airbags effectively protected the driver’s head, preventing contact with жесткие structures or external objects. Sensor data indicated a low risk of injuries to the driver’s legs and feet.

Airbag deployment in the Audi A4 driver-side small overlap frontal crash, demonstrating effective head protection.

Driver’s space maintained in the Audi A4 after driver-side small overlap frontal crash, minimizing leg and foot injury risks.

Technical measurements from the driver-side small overlap test are detailed below:

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CEN1614
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 4
Footrest (cm) 7
Left toepan (cm) 4
Brake pedal (cm) 4
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 3
Upper dash (cm) 3
Lower instrument panel (cm) 3

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CEN1614
Head
HIC-15 171
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 6
Maximum Nij 0.28
Chest maximum compression (mm) 30
Femur (kN)
Left 1.3
Right 0.4
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.42
Right 0.52
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.5
Right 1.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 93
Right 70

Learn more about the small overlap front test

Small Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Passenger-Side

Mirroring its driver-side performance, the Audi A4 also achieved a “Good” rating in the passenger-side small overlap frontal test. This evaluation, conducted by Volkswagen/Audi and assessed by the IIHS, ensures comparable safety for front-seat passengers.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation G (Good)
Structure and safety cage G (Good)
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Chest G (Good)
Hip/thigh G (Good)
Lower leg/foot G (Good)
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics G (Good)
Driver injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Chest G (Good)
Hip/thigh G (Good)
Lower leg/foot G (Good)
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics G (Good)

Technical measurements for the passenger-side small overlap test are provided below:

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTP1810
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 7
Footrest (cm) 13
Right toepan (cm) 7
Center toepan (cm) 3
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 0
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 2
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 3
Upper dash (cm) 3
Right lower dash (cm) 3

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTP1810
Head
HIC-15 106
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 16
Maximum Nij 0.24
Chest maximum compression (mm) 23
Femur (kN)
Left 0.6
Right 1.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.30
Right 0.28
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.4
Right 2.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 63
Right 88

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTP1810
Head
HIC-15 83
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.7
Extension bending moment (Nm) 6
Maximum Nij 0.17
Chest maximum compression (mm) 30
Femur (kN)
Left 0.2
Right 0.5
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.22
Right 0.19
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.2
Right 1.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 43
Right 40

Explore more about the small overlap front test

Moderate Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Original Test

In the moderate overlap frontal test, the Audi A4 again received a “Good” overall rating. This test, also conducted by Volkswagen/Audi and assessed by IIHS, evaluates occupant protection in a frontal collision involving a larger portion of the car’s front end.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation G (Good)
Structure and safety cage G (Good)
Driver injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Chest G (Good)
Leg/foot, left G (Good)
Leg/foot, right G (Good)
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics G (Good)

Technical measurements from the moderate overlap frontal test:

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTF1610
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 1
Left (cm) 1
Center (cm) 1
Right (cm) 1
Brake pedal (cm) 1
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 0
Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) -1
Rearward (cm) -3
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTF1610
Head
HIC-15 161
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm) 8
Maximum Nij 0.17
Chest maximum compression (mm) 25
Legs
Femur force – left (kN) 1.3
Femur force – right (kN) 0.4
Knee displacement – left (mm) 2
Knee displacement – right (mm) 1
Maximum tibia index – left 0.40
Maximum tibia index – right 0.30
Tibia axial force – left (kN) 3.1
Tibia axial force – right (kN) 2.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 63
Right 50

Learn more about the original moderate overlap front test

Side Impact Crash Test: Original Test

The Audi A4’s protection extends to side impacts, where it also secured a “Good” rating in the original side crash test. This test evaluates the vehicle’s ability to protect occupants in a side collision.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation G (Good)
Structure and safety cage G (Good)
Driver injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Torso G (Good)
Pelvis/leg G (Good)
Driver head protection G (Good)
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck G (Good)
Torso G (Good)
Pelvis/leg G (Good)
Rear passenger head protection G (Good)

Technical measurements from the side impact crash test:

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS1609
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat (cm) -19.0

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTS1609
Head HIC-15 453
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Compression (kN) 0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 32
Lateral force (kN) 1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 32
Average deflection (mm) 28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.85
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.49
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.8
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.1
Combined force (kN) 1.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.2
L-M moment (Nm) 93
A-P moment (Nm) 35

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID VTS1609
Head HIC-15 129
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 35
Lateral force (kN) 1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 30
Average deflection (mm) 24
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 6.22
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.83
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.5
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.0
Combined force (kN) 2.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.4
L-M moment (Nm) 47
A-P moment (Nm) -17

Discover more about the original side crash test

Roof Strength Test

The Audi A4’s roof strength was also rated as “Good”. This test measures the roof’s ability to withstand forces in a rollover accident.

Overall evaluation G (Good)
Curb weight 3,471 lbs
Peak force 18,540 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 5.34

Read more about the roof strength test

Head Restraints and Seats

For head restraints and seats, the Audi A4 again achieved a “Good” dynamic rating and seat/head restraint geometry rating, indicating effective protection against whiplash in rear-end collisions.

Overall evaluation G (Good)
Dynamic rating G (Good)
Seat/head restraint geometry G (Good)

Technical measurements for head restraints and seats:

Seat type Power leather seat
Geometry
Backset (mm) 25
Distance below top of head (mm) 14
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 11.1
Head contact time (ms) 64
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 0
Max neck tension (N) 429

Learn more about the head restraint & seat test

Headlight Ratings

The Audi A4 offers different headlight options, with ratings varying by trim level.

Prestige Trim Headlights

The Prestige trim headlights, featuring LED projector low beams and LED reflector high beams with high-beam assist, received an “Acceptable” overall rating.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall rating A (Acceptable)
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes

Premium Plus Trim Headlights

The Premium Plus trim headlights, also with LED projector low beams and LED reflector high beams but without high-beam assist, received a “Marginal” overall rating.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall rating M (Marginal)
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No

Premium Trim Headlights

The Premium trim headlights, equipped with HID projector low and high beams, also received a “Marginal” overall rating, noting some glare from the low beams.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall rating M (Marginal)
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No

Explore headlight evaluations for Audi A4

Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle

The Audi A4 excels in front crash prevention. With the optional “Audi Pre Sense Front” system (available in the Driver Assistance Package), it achieves a “Superior” rating. The standard “Audi Pre Sense City” system also earns a “Superior” rating. Both systems successfully avoided collisions in 12 mph tests and significantly reduced impact speed in 25 mph tests.

System details Overall evaluation
Optional Audi Pre Sense Front Superior
Standard Audi Pre Sense City Superior

Learn about the front crash prevention test for vehicles

Front Crash Prevention: Pedestrian (Day)

The Audi A4’s “Pre sense city” system also provides superior pedestrian front crash prevention, earning a “Superior” rating. The system avoided collisions in tests involving crossing children and adults at 12 and 25 mph.

System details Overall evaluation
Standard Pre sense city Superior

Discover more about pedestrian front crash prevention testing

Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)

The Audi A4’s LATCH system for child seat anchors received a “Good” rating, indicating ease of use and secure child seat installation. The vehicle has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and an additional position with a tether anchor.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation G (Good)

Read about child seat anchor evaluations

Conclusion

The Audi A4 stands out as a safe vehicle, consistently achieving “Good” ratings in critical IIHS crash tests. While headlight ratings vary by trim, the A4’s crashworthiness and front crash prevention systems are commendable, making it a strong choice for safety-conscious drivers and families. For more detailed information, refer to the IIHS reports and related resources.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *